Newtonian reflecting telescopes
Advantages
Lowest cost per inch of aperture compared to refractors and Catadioptrics since mirrors can be produced at less cost than lenses in medium to large apertures.
Reasonably compact and portable up to focal lengths of 1000mm.
Excellent for faint deep sky objects such as remote galaxies, nebulae and star clusters due to the generally fast focal ratios (f/4 to f/8).
Reasonably good for lunar and planetary work.
Good for deep sky astrophotography (but not as convenient and more difficult to use than Catadioptrics).
Low in optical aberrations and deliver very bright images.
Disadvantages
Requires regular alignment (collimation) of optics in order to perform at its best. Badly aligned optics can make the image quality suffer quite dramatically.
Primary mirror may require re-coating (usually after years of service).
The open nature of the tube assembly could mean more complicated cleaning of mirror surfaces when compared to telescopes of other designs.
Generally not suited for terrestrial applications.
Slight light loss due to secondary (diagonal) obstruction when compared with refractors.